Democracy vs dictatorship essay pakistan

These lines clearly state what the monarchy has evolved into …today , they are mostly people friendly , further the author never said that the monarch has always absolute power , of course he frames the law, he is the independent ruler of the people , but then he is given the ” varying degrees of power” in the modern world meaning his power is somehow controlled …that being said his powers are somehow stinted or at worst he can also be a figurehead ..thats why he says the idea is now somehow blurred and the strict lines of demarcations are somehow effaced .
Further i don’t think he is assuming that both are against each other , he never mentioned that , he just says that both are different , major diff- the government is in the form of monarchy its totally under the discretion of the monarch that it will be people friendly ( same as democracy which is means government of the people ) or against them …
So its a perfect articles …very insightful i must say

In August, the Asamblea Nacional Constituyente de Venezuela(ANC), officially took powers away from the capitalist dominated National Assembly. Of the 545 seats, 79 are reserved for workers in specific sectors such as public administration, service sector, industry, construction, transportation, and the oil industry. 8 are for campesinos and fishermen, 24 for students, 5 for the disabled. The business class has to be content with only 5 seats. This is what Lenin meant by ‘dictatorship of the proletariat’, the rule of the exploited majority over the opulent few- in other words, democracy in substance not just in words.

I personally believe that Direct Democracy is the way to go. The attack on minorities is an important issue which keeps happening. The only way to solve this is by tackling the educational system. One can agree that Direct democracy can only work with an educated society-if not you’ll end up with dumb individuals voting for something they do not understand the impact it could have on minority groups/individuals/families. If individuals are educated to understand each other and work for the benefit of the social welfare than this idea of “majority vs minority” would be less than a problem.
Another thing is Direct Democracy has to be taken to the lowest analytical level. What I mean with this is that the vote does not necessarily have to be taken to a national level, but maybe more local. Laws do not have to be applied equally to all states/provinces/cantons/cities/etc… as they can differ opinion and believes from one another. Now this is just my personal opinion…

Mancur Olson suggests that the emergence of dictatorships can be linked to the concept of "roving bandits", individuals in an atomic system who move from place to place extracting wealth from individuals. These bandits provide a disincentive for investment and production. Olson states that a community of individuals would be better served if that bandit were to establish himself as a stationary bandit to monopolize theft in the form of taxes. Also, Except from the community, the bandits themselves will be better served, according to Olson, by transforming themselves into "stationary bandits". By settling down and making themselves the rulers of a territory, they will be able to make more profits through taxes than they used to obtain through plunder. By maintaining order and providing protection to the community, the bandits will create a peaceful environment in which their people can maximize their surplus which means a greater taxable base. Thus, a potential dictator will have a greater incentive to provide security to a given community from which he is extracting taxes and conversely, the people from whom he extracts the taxes are more likely to produce because they will be unconcerned with potential theft by other bandits. This is the rationality that bandits use in order to justify their transformation from "roving bandits" into "stationary bandits". [31]

We must not leap to the conclusion that there is a “true democracy” which is a natural amalgam of good government as representative government, political justice, equality, liberty, and human rights. For such volatile ingredients can at times be unstable unless in carefully measured and monitored combinations. Is “good government” or “social justice” unequivocally democratic, even in the nicest liberal senses? Probably not. Tocqueville wrote in the 1830s of the inevitability of democracy, but warned against “the dangers of a tyranny of the majority.” Well, perhaps he cared less for democracy than he did for liberty. But even Thomas Jefferson remarked in the old age that “an elective despotism was not what we fought for”; ... John Stuart Mill whose Essay on Liberty and Considerations on Representative Government are two of the great books of the modern world, came to believe that every adult (yes, women too) should have the vote, but only after compulsory secondary education had been instituted and had time to take effect.

Democracy vs dictatorship essay pakistan

democracy vs dictatorship essay pakistan

Mancur Olson suggests that the emergence of dictatorships can be linked to the concept of "roving bandits", individuals in an atomic system who move from place to place extracting wealth from individuals. These bandits provide a disincentive for investment and production. Olson states that a community of individuals would be better served if that bandit were to establish himself as a stationary bandit to monopolize theft in the form of taxes. Also, Except from the community, the bandits themselves will be better served, according to Olson, by transforming themselves into "stationary bandits". By settling down and making themselves the rulers of a territory, they will be able to make more profits through taxes than they used to obtain through plunder. By maintaining order and providing protection to the community, the bandits will create a peaceful environment in which their people can maximize their surplus which means a greater taxable base. Thus, a potential dictator will have a greater incentive to provide security to a given community from which he is extracting taxes and conversely, the people from whom he extracts the taxes are more likely to produce because they will be unconcerned with potential theft by other bandits. This is the rationality that bandits use in order to justify their transformation from "roving bandits" into "stationary bandits". [31]

Media:

democracy vs dictatorship essay pakistandemocracy vs dictatorship essay pakistandemocracy vs dictatorship essay pakistandemocracy vs dictatorship essay pakistan